Side-by-side
Leonardo vs LundHalsey
Two Air Traffic Control & Navigation Aids suppliers compared on Aviation Souk. Stats, certifications, and supplier-declared strengths drawn from the indexed profiles. Both compete in Air Traffic Control & Navigation Aids.
Procurement comparison
The spec-by-spec breakdown.
| Procurement dimension | Leonardo | LundHalsey |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | IT | AE |
| Headquarters | Rome, Italy | — |
| Founded · years in Gulf | 1948 · 40 yrs in Gulf | — · Gulf tenure not declared |
| Categories overlap | Both: Air Traffic Control & Navigation Aids Only Leonardo: Defence Avionics & Radar · Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence · Tactical Communications & Data Links | Both: Air Traffic Control & Navigation Aids |
| GCC airport installations | 4 indexed GCC airports DXBAUHRUHJED | 0 indexed GCC airports |
| Certifications | Only here: ISO 9001, NATO, EASA | None declared. |
| Flagship products | 4 flagship products Falcon Shield C-UAS · M-346 trainer · AW139/AW169 helicopters · ATC radar | 4 flagship products Area Command Console (height adjustable) · Tower Command Console for ATC · Tower Sim Display 360 ATC training and simulation system · Control room design services (ISO 11064) |
| International airports | 0 indexed | 0 indexed |
| Tier on Aviation Souk | Indexed-only | Indexed-only |
| Decision fork | If your scope extends to Defence Avionics & Radar, Leonardo brings that as well. | If you only need Air Traffic Control & Navigation Aids, LundHalsey is the more focused pick. |
Decide
Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your brief.
The AI cross-references both suppliers against your specific tender — airport, certifications required, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.
One form, two RFQs — buyer sends a single brief and both Leonardo and LundHalsey receive it through Aviation Souk.