Side-by-side
AECOM vs Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM)
Two Terminal Design & Architecture suppliers compared on Aviation Souk. Stats, certifications, and supplier-declared strengths drawn from the indexed profiles. Both compete in Terminal Design & Architecture.
Souk's data signal
Where the AI cites each one.
AECOM
Rich · 70%
7 products · 0 certs · 5 named installations
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM)
Rich · 68%
1 products · 0 certs · 0 named installations
Named installations
AECOM
John F. Kennedy InternationalLos Angeles InternationalBoston Logan InternationalSingapore ChangiJorge Chavez International
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM)
No named installations in supplier source.
Top products extracted
AECOM
Airport Master PlanningTerminal Architecture and DesignAirside EngineeringProgram and Construction ManagementAviation AdvisoryEnvironmental and Sustainability ServicesCost and Project Management
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM)
Airport Terminal Architecture and Design
| Stat | AECOM | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) |
|---|---|---|
| GCC airports | 6 | 3 |
| International airports | 0 | 0 |
| Certifications | 5 | 4 |
| Founded | 1990 | 1936 |
| Years in Gulf | 35 | 45 |
| Country of origin | US | US |
| Headquarters | Dallas, United States | Chicago, United States |
| Flagship products | 4 | 4 |
Decide
Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your brief.
The AI cross-references both suppliers against your specific tender — airport, certifications required, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.